Skip to main content
Beauchamps Close
Back

  • B-Connect
  • About us
    • About Beauchamps
    • Client service
    • Core values
    • Corporate social responsibility
    • History
    • Knowledge management
    • Partnerships
  • Our People
  • Our services

    Practice Areas

    • Banking & Finance
    • Commercial Property
    • Company Secretarial
    • Construction
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Corporate Governance & Company Compliance
    • Crisis Management
    • Data Protection & Freedom of Information
    • Employment & Benefits
    • Energy & Natural Resources
    • EU, Competition & Procurement
    • Financial Services & Regulation
    • Insolvency & Corporate Restructuring
    • Insurance & Professional Indemnity
    • Inward Investment
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Medical Negligence and Personal Injury*
    • Mergers & Acquisitions

    Sectors

    • Brexit
    • Charities & Not For Profit
    • Energy & Natural Resources
    • Family Business
    • Financial Services
    • Food & Agri
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Real Estate
    • Retail
    • Sport
    • Technology & Communications
    View All Services
  • What's new
    • Beauchamps - proud sponsor of and official legal adviser to Leinster Rugby
    • Brexit Update
    • Doing business in Ireland
    • General Data Protection Regulation
    • The Companies Act 2014
    • Covid-19 Updates
  • Careers
    • Why join Beauchamps?
    • Current opportunities
    • Lawyers
    • Business services
    • Intern & trainee programmes
Contact Search
Search Menu
Beauchamps
Search Menu
What's new

Disclosure of Operator of Social Media Account: Recent Judgment

22 Jun 2020

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. What's new
  3. Publication

Share

Summary

In the recent case of Parcel Connect Limited trading as Fastway Couriers and A & G Couriers Limited v Twitter International Company, Mr Justice Allen made an Order directing Twitter to provide details it holds in relation to the identity of the creator or controller of a parody account.

Background

The Plaintiffs operate logistical services including courier distribution under the name Fastway Couriers. In 2019 the Plaintiffs became aware that a Twitter account was created by a third party using their logo and initially the handle @fastwayIRE.

The Plaintiffs' proceedings sought a Norwich Pharmacal Order and a number of injunctions, including an order that the account be removed from Twitter. A Norwich Pharmacal Order is an action by an injured party against another party who may not have committed any wrong, but due to a connection to the events surrounding the wrongdoing, they may be able to identify the wrongdoer. These orders are not commonplace, with the party seeking such an order being required, as laid out in Megaleasing UK Ltd. v. Barrett [1993] ILRM 497, to establish a very clear and unambiguous case of wrongdoing, and, more recently in O’Brien v. Red Flag Consulting Limited [2017] IECA 258, a strong prima facie case.

The Court heard that following correspondence from the Plaintiffs, the account in question was suspended by Twitter for a few days before being restored as it did not violate its terms of service or rules. Counsel for Twitter explained to the Court that the account had now been deactivated by the account holder. Twitter said it had no obligation to monitor, and is not the arbiter of, the material posted on its platform and will not release user information without a court order. As to whether such an order should be made, Twitter stood silent.

Decision and Commentary

Notwithstanding the fact that Mr Justice Allen was not entirely convinced that the account was masquerading as the Plaintiffs, he felt there was good grounds for their complaint. The Judge was persuaded that the Plaintiffs have a case to make that the postings mean they are incompetent and inefficient, the use of the Fastway logo infringes on its trademark and that a strong prima facie case has been made that the goodwill in the name and mark has been damaged by its use on the account and its association with the comments posted.

In making the Order that Twitter disclose details it holds regarding the account holders, Mr Justice Allen followed the case of EMI Record Ireland v Eircom Ltd [2005] 4 IR 148 by ruling that this Order was expressly conditional on an undertaking by the Plaintiffs that information disclosed would be used solely for the specific purpose it was sought in respect of the wrongs complained of.

This case demonstrates the circumstances where a Court may grant a Norwich Pharmacal Order and applies the prior tests to be met.

Parcel Connect Limited trading as Fastway Couriers and A & G Couriers Limited v Twitter International Company [2020] IEHC 279

About the author

Edward Lyons

Partner

About Edward

Edward is a partner in our litigation & dispute resolution team. Edward works with large financial institutions, financial service providers, real estate investors, receivers, liquidators, local authorities, public sector bodies and  regulators. Edward works extensively with a range of public and regulatory bodies in contentious matters, particularly in the healthcare sector.

Beauchamps

Related Services

Practice Areas

    Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Beauchamps

Our Location

Riverside Two

Sir John Rogerson's Quay

Dublin 2, D02 KV60

Ireland, DX No. 63

General Enquiries

T: +353 (0) 1 418 0600

F: + 353 (0) 1 418 0699

E: info@beauchamps.ie

  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2022 Beauchamps LLP